[WIP] plot_age_pyramid: add the possibility to have one datetime_ref that differs for each patient

[strayMat]

The previous plot_age_pyramid function only allow for one fixed datetime reference for all persons.

In some case studies , we would like to have a different datetime of reference for each person. Eg. the date of their inclusion in the study. The objective is to draw the pyramid of ages of patient at inclusion. (Very useful and more pertinent when we have cohorts over a long time period).

Description

Add to plot_age_pyramid the possibility to give the datetime_ref argument as a column name.

Checklist

• [x] Changes were documented in the changelog (pending section).
• [x] If necessary, changes were made to the documentation (eg new pipeline).

[Vincent-Maladiere]

Looks good! We need to merge #20 before we merge this PR as well.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 95.08% // Head: 94.94% // Decreases project coverage by -0.13% :warning:

Coverage data is based on head (1b4f6a7) compared to base (2ad6ec3). Patch coverage: 87.17% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #18 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 95.08% 94.94% -0.14% ========================================== Files 65 65 Lines 2034 2057 +23 ========================================== + Hits 1934 1953 +19 - Misses 100 104 +4 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/aphp/eds-scikit/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [eds\_scikit/utils/custom\_implem/custom\_implem.py](https://codecov.io/gh/aphp/eds-scikit/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp#diff-ZWRzX3NjaWtpdC91dGlscy9jdXN0b21faW1wbGVtL2N1c3RvbV9pbXBsZW0ucHk=) | `75.00% <44.44%> (-12.50%)` | :arrow_down: | | [eds\_scikit/plot/data\_quality.py](https://codecov.io/gh/aphp/eds-scikit/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp#diff-ZWRzX3NjaWtpdC9wbG90L2RhdGFfcXVhbGl0eS5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [eds\_scikit/utils/custom\_implem/cut.py](https://codecov.io/gh/aphp/eds-scikit/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp#diff-ZWRzX3NjaWtpdC91dGlscy9jdXN0b21faW1wbGVtL2N1dC5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [eds\_scikit/icu/icu\_care\_site.py](https://codecov.io/gh/aphp/eds-scikit/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp#diff-ZWRzX3NjaWtpdC9pY3UvaWN1X2NhcmVfc2l0ZS5weQ==) | `100.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [eds\_scikit/structures/description.py](https://codecov.io/gh/aphp/eds-scikit/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp#diff-ZWRzX3NjaWtpdC9zdHJ1Y3R1cmVzL2Rlc2NyaXB0aW9uLnB5) | `100.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [eds\_scikit/emergency/emergency\_visit.py](https://codecov.io/gh/aphp/eds-scikit/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp#diff-ZWRzX3NjaWtpdC9lbWVyZ2VuY3kvZW1lcmdlbmN5X3Zpc2l0LnB5) | `100.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [eds\_scikit/emergency/emergency\_care\_site.py](https://codecov.io/gh/aphp/eds-scikit/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp#diff-ZWRzX3NjaWtpdC9lbWVyZ2VuY3kvZW1lcmdlbmN5X2NhcmVfc2l0ZS5weQ==) | `90.32% <0.00%> (+0.32%)` | :arrow_up: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=aphp)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[strayMat]

Where are we for this PR ? I am not sure to see what is missing before merging ?

[Vincent-Maladiere]

Close in favor of #43 to avoid nested merging conflicts.