Attributes with array of objects produce incomplete schema

[agougousis]

The following part of my text file:

• Response 200 (application/json)

  • Attributes (object)
  • nodes (array[object])
    • id: 4 (number)
    • sname: Chromista (string) - The scientific name
    • rank: Kingdom (string) - The taxonomic rank of the scientific name
    • authorship: noworms, 1603 (string) - Authorship information about the scientific name
  • Body

  {
      "nodes": [
          {
              "id": "1",
              "sname": "Animalia",
              "rank": "Kingdom",
              "authorship": "noworms, 1603"
          },
          {
              "id": "2",
              "sname": "Archaea",
              "rank": "Kingdom",
              "authorship": "noworms, 1603"
          },
          {
              "id": "3",
              "sname": "Bacteria",
              "rank": "Kingdom",
              "authorship": "noworms, 1603"
          },
          {
              "id": "4",
              "sname": "Chromista",
              "rank": "Kingdom",
              "authorship": "noworms, 1603"
          },
          {
              "id": "5",
              "sname": "Fungi",
              "rank": "Kingdom",
              "authorship": "noworms, 1603"
          }
      ],
      "hasMore": 1
  }

Produces this HTML:

The part of schema inside the ""nodes" is missing! Why? I have also tried to use data structures but the schema remains incomplete.

[pksunkara]

@agougousis Can you try the following?

nodes (array[object], fixed)

[agougousis]

Ok! Though I haven't found yet where this "fixed" world came from, now the schema is complete. However, it seems that the produced schema is not right. The schema produced is:

and the correct schema should be:

Am I wrong?

[pksunkara]

Can you try this?

+ nodes (array, fixed)
    + (object)
        + id: 4 (number)

[agougousis]

Yeap! A lot better! I didn't think that "anonymous" objects can be defined! I am not sure, but I think that the brackets marked in the following screenshot should not be there. What do you think?

[w-vi]

@agougousis The brackets are correct as items is an array of possible types

[agougousis]

I don't remember very well the rules, but in http://jsonschema.net/ (a quick and dirty solution that I use from time to time) when i give the json data as input it gives me the schema without these brackets.

[kamihouse]

@agougousis use a fixed-type for this:

+ nodes (array, fixed-type)
    + (object)
        + id: 4 (number)

[tomacf]

+1 for the fixed-type

fixed - instance of this type structure and values are fixed. This attribute propagates to Nested Member Types.

fixed-type - instance of this type structure is fixed, value is not. This attribute does not propagate to Nested Member Types.

https://apiblueprint.org/documentation/mson/specification.html#353-type-attribute