Currently, the FabIL compiler will not complain if there is a field in a class which is a non-Fabric object that does not implement JavaInlineable. As a result, this causes inconsistencies for non-Fabric object fields that are hard to debug and should've been a compiler error.
We should set up FabIL's compiler to error when there are fields of Fabric types which are neither transient, a Fabric Object type, a type which implements JavaInlineable, or somehow statically initialized to a constant value.
Currently, the FabIL compiler will not complain if there is a field in a class which is a non-Fabric object that does not implement
JavaInlineable. As a result, this causes inconsistencies for non-Fabric object fields that are hard to debug and should've been a compiler error.We should set up FabIL's compiler to error when there are fields of Fabric types which are neither transient, a Fabric Object type, a type which implements JavaInlineable, or somehow statically initialized to a constant value.