Closed lauralindzey closed 1 year ago
(CI is expected to fail for this because it's building against tag v0.0.1 of hydrographic_msgs.)
I have tested this using a converted bagfile:
rosrun sonar_image_proc draw_sonar_node
(visualized in rqt, confirmed not using more CPU than before)rosrun sonar_image_proc bag2sonar -osd -o output.bag input.bag
(visualized output.bag in rqt)rosrun sonar_image_proc sonar_pointcloud.py
(visualized in rviz)Thanks. Should update the tag for hydrographic_msgs in the .rosinstall
... need to do this, and it should also fix CI?
Yup, that did the trick! Thanks =)
DRAFT. Wait to merge this until all relevant packages are ready.
Converting to match the new acoustic_msgs definitions, which renamed SonarImage -> {Raw,Projected}SonarImage and rearranged fields + metadata representation.