Closed phryneas closed 1 month ago
Path | Size |
---|---|
{ ApolloNextAppProvider, NextSSRApolloClient, NextSSRInMemoryCache } from '@apollo/experimental-nextjs-app-support/ssr' (Browser ESM) | 7.79 KB (+0.02% πΊ) |
{ WrapApolloProvider, ApolloClient, InMemoryCache } from '@apollo/client-react-streaming' (Browser ESM) | 1.41 KB (0%) |
{ buildManualDataTransport } from '@apollo/client-react-streaming/manual-transport' (Browser ESM) | 6.27 KB (+0.29% πΊ) |
@apollo/client-react-streaming (Browser ESM) | 2.14 KB (+0.92% πΊ) |
@apollo/client-react-streaming (SSR ESM) | 1.74 KB (+1.03% πΊ) |
@apollo/client-react-streaming (RSC ESM) | 1.02 KB (+2.46% πΊ) |
@apollo/client-react-streaming/manual-transport (Browser ESM) | 6.46 KB (+0.48% πΊ) |
@apollo/client-react-streaming/manual-transport (SSR ESM) | 6.34 KB (+0.35% πΊ) |
@apollo/experimental-nextjs-app-support/ssr (Browser ESM) | 8.41 KB (+0.13% πΊ) |
@apollo/experimental-nextjs-app-support/ssr (SSR ESM) | 8.33 KB (+0.31% πΊ) |
@apollo/experimental-nextjs-app-support/ssr (RSC ESM) | 857 B (+2.15% πΊ) |
@apollo/experimental-nextjs-app-support/rsc (RSC ESM) | 278 B (+6.52% πΊ) |
133141c(current) vs 9fc65d3 main#92(baseline)
[!WARNING] Bundle contains 1 duplicate package β View duplicate packages
Bundle metrics
1 change
ββββββββββ | ββββββCurrent Job #93 |
βββββBaseline Job #92 |
---|---|---|
Initial JS | 890.59KiB |
890.59KiB |
Initial CSS | 0B |
0B |
Cache Invalidation | 22.25% |
0.04% |
Chunks | 24 |
24 |
Assets | 45 |
45 |
Modules | 512 |
512 |
Duplicate Modules | 30 |
30 |
Duplicate Code | 1.29% |
1.29% |
Packages | 29 |
29 |
Duplicate Packages | 1 |
1 |
no changes
View job #93 reportβView pr/edge branch activityβView project dashboard
/release:pr
A new release has been made for this PR. You can install the package you need using one of
npm i @apollo/experimental-nextjs-app-support@0.0.0-commit-84f7c8d
npm i @apollo/client-react-streaming@0.0.0-commit-84f7c8d
I believe this should resolve #261 and #262.
I'm a bit hesitant to just slap a "worker" (which doesn't seem to be standardized?) on here, so I'm going for the more granular
"edge-light"