Open danielkcz opened 5 years ago
I'm also interested in having this feature. Would enable me to use this plugin with colocation of relevant queries and mutations to components, but centralize the fragments elsewhere.
We would be very interested to find out if this is possible by now. If not we are willing to dig in and invest time and ressource to enable this.
We understand that its possible today to use gql tags to use shared fragments, but we have moved to extracting all out graphql in separate .graphql
files. And we are missing the ability todo this dearly.
Possible approaches:
./**/*.fragment.graphql
In either case the fragments should then be available to all other graphql queries / mutations / subscriptions.
@FredyC maybe the extension has changed since you first raised the issue, but as long as the “shared” fragments are referenced/included (and it’s allowed in the include
definition in the apollo.config.js
), it seems to work as expected for me.
import { ImageFragment, TagFragment } from "./Fragments";
Thank you for this amazing extension. I wasn't really hoping something like this would appear anytime soon and be so simple in its nature ❤️
We do work with fragments a lot and there is bunch of them that are very common and used in many places. Each fragment sits alone in a
*.gql
file. It would be amazing if autocomplete would offer available fragments relevant for containing type.There is a related issue (#182) so I assume fragments are not considered much just yet.
That would surely require for the extension to parse all graphql files beforehand (and based on changes) to collect available fragments and to what types they are related, but it should be doable, right?