appirio-tech / connect-app

Build your next project on Connect with the power of crowdsourcing
https://connect.topcoder.com
44 stars 139 forks source link

Optimize the number of calls being made for loading a Connect project dashboard #2815

Open vikasrohit opened 5 years ago

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

As of now, we are making too many calls to fetch the data of the project on the dashboard and the reason is that we need to show some portion of every possible data attached with a project, on the dashboard. Along the feature development across releases, we introduced new API calls to fulfil certain requirements. However, it seems that we are now making some extra calls to the APIs which we might be able to reduce still keeping all the features working. Purpose of this tasks is to identify all such places where we can improve the page load performance, either by directly optimizing the code of the front end or identify the API changes which can significantly improve the performance.

fyi @maxceem @RishiRajSahu

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

@maxceem One improvement we can do here is to don't make separate calls to loadMembers action for every phase topic load, instead of that we can make a combined call to loadMembers after all phase topics are loaded successfully. Do you think that would create any issue in terms of rendering of the phase topics?

maxceem commented 5 years ago

@vikasrohit I guess it should be ok. We will need to make sure that until members are loaded we can still display topics/posts in the phases with some placeholder info for users.

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

@maxceem I tried something here https://github.com/appirio-tech/connect-app/commit/a0d137b9dd2eaf7d7d94d383843f91de273b50e9, in case you want to take a look tomorrow morning.

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

@maxceem Another possible optimization would be to get phase topics in single call by filtering at referenceId. I think we did have a rationale for fetching them individually but I am not able to recall. So, it might be a good time to refresh that.

maxceem commented 5 years ago

@vikasrohit I guess we can do this optimization together with implementing a new related feature: https://github.com/appirio-tech/connect-app/issues/2835

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

Yes, absolutely.

maxceem commented 5 years ago

@vikasrohit At the moment posts are not shown at the Phases discussion tabs on DEV, see https://connect.topcoder-dev.com/projects/7489/plan:

image

Could it be connected with this PR? https://github.com/appirio-tech/connect-app/pull/2840

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

Fully probable. Good catch. Do you think you would be able to look at it?

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

I think it fetching the posts for the phase discussions correctly, only thing is that the phase card is not picking up those discussions.

maxceem commented 5 years ago

I can run a small F2F for this if you want. Too much things to do.

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

No worries. I can debug it today.

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

@maxceem I have patched the code for the issue. Let me know if you are still seeing any issue.

maxceem commented 5 years ago

Works good to me!

maxceem commented 5 years ago

@vikasrohit there is some issue connected with changes done in this commit https://github.com/appirio-tech/connect-app/commit/4f5b5800872f1a910090b86d73b6614a224156cb

When we load project http://local.topcoder-dev.com:3000/projects/7442/plan there is an error in console: image

The reason for this error is that one of the server requests doesn't return topics for one of the phases:

image

After that the value here is null: image

So then topics array contains null here: image

I've made a fix in this commit https://github.com/appirio-tech/connect-app/commit/b602fd4b700cfe408fd0286f92d6ddfbcedd76fb. Just wanted to let you know in case you see some other root of this issue which should be fixed instead of doing such fix.

vikasrohit commented 5 years ago

Thanks for catching that @maxceem.

Could we do _.get(resp, 'value', []) instead of _.get(resp, 'value') ? [_.get(resp, 'value')] : []?

Update: I think resp has value key with null value, so it _.get won't return default value.

maxceem commented 5 years ago

We have to return an array here while value is one element of the array. So if value is defined _.get(resp, 'value', []) would be one element instead of array.