Added shared credentials for Digi - Githubissues

apple / password-manager-resources

A place for creators and users of password managers to collaborate on resources to make password management better.

MIT License

4.11k stars 439 forks source link

Added shared credentials for Digi #772

Open revolter opened 3 weeks ago

revolter commented 3 weeks ago

Overall Checklist

[x] I agree to the project's Developer Certificate of Origin
[x] The top-level JSON objects are sorted alphabetically
[x] There are no open pull requests for the same update

for password-rules.json

[ ] The given rule isn't particularly standard and obvious for password managers
[ ] Generated passwords have been tested from this rule using the Password Rules Validation Tool
[ ] Information has been included about the website's requirements (eg. screenshots, error messages, steps during experimentation, etc.)
[ ] The PR isn't documenting something that would be a common practice among password managers (e.g. minimal length of 6)

for change-password-URLs.json

[ ] There is no Well-Known URL for Changing Passwords (https://example.com/.well-known/change-password)
[ ] The URL either makes the experience better or no worse than being directed to just the domain in a non-logged-in state

for shared-credentials.json

[x] There's evidence the domains are currently related (SSL certificates, DNS entries, valid links between sites, legal documents etc.) `digi.ro`	`digionline.ro`
https://who.is/whois/digi.ro	https://who.is/whois/digionline.ro

digiromania.ro redirects to digi.ro: https://digiromania.ro
rcs-rds.ro redirects to digi.ro: https://rcs-rds.ro

[x] If using shared, the new group serves login pages on each of the included domains, and those login pages accept accounts from the others. (For example, we wouldn't use a shared association from google.co.il to google.com, because google.co.il redirects to accounts.google.com for sign in.)
[x] If using from and to, the new group, the from domain(s) redirect to the to domain to log in.

for shared-credentials-historical.json

[ ] You believe that the domains were associated at some point in the past and can explain that relationship

rmondello commented 3 weeks ago

One of the linters is failing because we currently don’t allow overlapping rules. I’m thinking about what to do with this.

revolter commented 3 weeks ago

Want some help?