Open MrLotU opened 4 years ago
Hmm... if it's possible to configure swift-format in some way which can catch this that we can enable I think. Do you know if that's possible?
Otherwise I'm not sure about the value/effort ratio; we build on 5.1 as well, so this build would fail on compilation if there's a missing return right?
I know that swift-format can remove the return statement on 5.2, so one imagines it can add it in 5.1 mode.
Yeah, not at all sure if this is possible, but something that would be helpful if it was. If not, than indeed CI failing on older Swift versions will catch it, but pre-catching things like this is always preferred IMO 😄
+1 to deal with this in swift-format config, this will then be naturally integrated into the sanity check
Since Swift 5.2 (IIRC) you're allowed to omit the
return
statement in single statement functions and getters as such:Since we also support versions pre 5.2, the sanity script should check for this and enforce the use of
return
statements everywhere.Expected behavior
The sanity script should check and correct missing
return
statements.Actual behavior
Sanity script does not correct this
If possible, minimal yet complete reproducer code (or URL to code)
See #61 (Does not use
return
in a couple of places, did pass sanity script)