Closed maxoly closed 2 months ago
Thanks for the PR — and sorry for the super late response.
This situation should have been handled by the FramingParser
. There could be a bug in the FramingParser
, though.
Are you passing your data into that?
Hi @danieleggert, thank you for getting back to me!
I'm not currently using the FramingParser
for handling the data. Instead, I'm utilizing NWConnection.receive(minimumIncompleteLength: maximumLength:)
to manage incoming data streams. After receiving the data, I pass it directly to an instance of NIOSingleStepByteToMessageProcessor<NIOResponseDecoder>
for processing.
Hi @danieleggert, thank you for getting back to me!
I'm not currently using the
FramingParser
for handling the data. Instead, I'm utilizingNWConnection.receive(minimumIncompleteLength: maximumLength:)
to manage incoming data streams. After receiving the data, I pass it directly to an instance ofNIOSingleStepByteToMessageProcessor<NIOResponseDecoder>
for processing.
You need to somehow use the FramingParser
before calling into the ResponseParser
.
I’m not sure what the right fix is, but ResponseParser
is intentionally not handling this, because it’s only supposed to operate on the output of FramingParser
. This should be called out in docs. I can look into that.
How are you using NIOSingleStepByteToMessageProcessor
/ NIOResponseDecoder
? I’m using the core part of this parser instead of the “outer wrapper”, but those “outer wrappers” are supposed to work and also use the FramingParser
+ ResponseParser
combination.
Let me know if you want help with this. We should probably have better documentation on how to do this.
Closing this for now.
Fix IMAP response parsing when responses are received in fragments.
Motivation:
The application I'm developing uses NWConnection to communicate with an IMAP server. Occasionally, the server (or NWConnection?) may split the IMAP response into fragments, even when
maximumLength
is set to a high value in thenwConnection.receive
method, making such fragmentation unnecessary. In these cases, subsequent parts of the response might begin with a new line, causing parsing issues. For example:First part:
Second and final part:
While the first part is parsed correctly, the second part results in a parsing error. To address this issue, I have implemented optional parsing for a newline at the beginning of the response.
Modifications:
Result:
After this change, the application can correctly parse IMAP responses received in fragments, even when a fragment starts with a newline. This improvement prevents parsing errors in fragmented response scenarios, ensuring reliable communication with the IMAP server and enhancing the application's resilience to varying network behaviours.