Open applepiofmyeye opened 7 months ago
Thank you for your feedback! Yes we do intend it for note to accept empty strings, and we do not want to over validate the input necessarily as it does not impede on any of our operations, and it makes sense that note can be empty, unlike name. If we validate too much, we might even end up with additional bug below.
However, we do understand the concern of overwriting the previous note, which we have considered under the planned enhancement. In which case, it would be a separate bug under feature flaw.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Running the command
note 3 n/
or with a space as wellnote 3 n/
is successful.I think this is a minor bug but slightly counter-intuitive! Users might accidentally press "Enter" too soon and have to retype the command again. Maybe there could be a restriction against empty notes?