nus-pe-script
commented
1 week ago Team's Response
No details provided by team.
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Does not allow creation of doctor with same name and different phone number
It is possible for two doctors to have the same name and different contact details, so it should be allowed to be added into the system. The UG states that it is considered a duplicate if all three fields are the same, but here the phone number is different and it was still blocked and considered a duplicate.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2425S1/pe-interim#2982] [original labels: severity.Medium type.FunctionalityBug]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
No details provided by team.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
## :question: Issue type Team chose [`type.FunctionalityBug`] Originally [`type.DocumentationBug`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]
## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.Medium`] Originally [`severity.Low`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]
Issue: The UG states that:
Which seems to imply that another doctor being added would only be considered a duplicate if there is already one with the same name and phone and email. However, when a doctor already exists and I attempt to add another doctor with the same name and email but different phone number, there is an error message that the doctor already exists. Thus, the UG isn't quite correct/clear enough about what the criterion for duplicates are.
To replicate, enter the following commands
createD n/Dr1 p/91234567 e/dr1@gmail.com a/8 Kent Ridge Drive 359872createD n/Dr1 p/98765432 e/dr1@gmail.com a/8 Kent Ridge Drive 359872