feat: use lassie for retrievals

[rvagg]

Not intended to be merged (yet anyway, we can have that conversation later). This is for dev purposes to make sure we get interfaces right and give me something functional so I can actually use code over in lassie for something real.

Depends on:

• https://github.com/filecoin-project/lassie/pull/4
• https://github.com/application-research/filclient/pull/112
  • https://github.com/filecoin-project/boost/pull/1009

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 20.90% // Head: 5.70% // Decreases project coverage by -15.20% :warning:

Coverage data is based on head (0a575d2) compared to base (f1df860). Patch coverage: 0.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #149 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 20.90% 5.70% -15.21% ========================================== Files 16 10 -6 Lines 2334 1490 -844 ========================================== - Hits 488 85 -403 + Misses 1816 1401 -415 + Partials 30 4 -26 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/application-research/autoretrieve/pull/149?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=application-research) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [autoretrieve.go](https://codecov.io/gh/application-research/autoretrieve/pull/149/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=application-research#diff-YXV0b3JldHJpZXZlLmdv) | `0.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [bitswap/provider.go](https://codecov.io/gh/application-research/autoretrieve/pull/149/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=application-research#diff-Yml0c3dhcC9wcm92aWRlci5nbw==) | `0.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [config.go](https://codecov.io/gh/application-research/autoretrieve/pull/149/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=application-research#diff-Y29uZmlnLmdv) | `0.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [endpoint/estuary.go](https://codecov.io/gh/application-research/autoretrieve/pull/149/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=application-research#diff-ZW5kcG9pbnQvZXN0dWFyeS5nbw==) | `0.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [endpoint/indexer.go](https://codecov.io/gh/application-research/autoretrieve/pull/149/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=application-research#diff-ZW5kcG9pbnQvaW5kZXhlci5nbw==) | `0.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=application-research). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=application-research)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[hannahhoward]

@rvagg @kylehuntsman 's PR is merged can we move this forward? Any reason not to?

[rvagg]

https://github.com/application-research/filclient/pull/112 is the blocker, and it's blocked by having a tagged boost—we could just use an untagged master over there but I don't think we need to rush this, I'm happy to keep this branch updated on both ends for now