This new table would look mostly like the retrieval_success_records , with a flag for failed to capture the failure events.
Since we need both success/failure counts in our reputation calculation, I think this would make it quite ergonomic for us. We could query it once (aggregate by matching sp, in a given timestamp window),
Depends on #21
This new table would look mostly like the retrieval_success_records , with a flag for failed to capture the failure events. Since we need both success/failure counts in our reputation calculation, I think this would make it quite ergonomic for us. We could query it once (aggregate by matching sp, in a given timestamp window),