The change in the Content field would force us to rebuild the contents table and given that this field mapping is just for naming convenience (using filename instead of name) without any major functionality introduced, we should revert and just use the same field name.
This PR reverts all the changes we did to rename the name field to filename.
Changes
The change in the
Content
field would force us to rebuild thecontents
table and given that this field mapping is just for naming convenience (using filename instead of name) without any major functionality introduced, we should revert and just use the same field name.This PR reverts all the changes we did to rename the
name
field tofilename
.Related PR
https://github.com/application-research/estuary/pull/389
Verification
estuary-www