Open vaibhavsood opened 6 years ago
I don't see this becoming an official image. If you have any suggestions about how to set up a reliable CI pipeline that will include the additional architectures, I'm OK with including them. In my experience, the Docker Hub continuous builds have been pretty unreliable for a while.
Sure, thanks!
My interest here is to publish ppc64le docker images (ideally official), reason for me suggesting it be made official is that would cover auto-building of the images (since Docker Hub would handle the build process), could that be a reason for considering making this official (i can understand there being many other reasons against it, just want to check once :))
Otherwise, probably can help with setting up a local CI build for ppc64le (work as part of a team which helps in setting up ppc64le builds for opensource packages), just want to know your thoughts for official once, thanks!
Hi, I'm looking to enable docker containers for packages like docker-curl for multiple architectures on dockerhub, starting off with a focus on ppc64le. Wanted to check on the work that will be involved to do that
I have locally been able to successfully test ppc64le changes to the dockerfiles in this repo - changes for enabling additional arch would be minimum.
Would like to know how a multi-arch image for this can be initiated? The official images have this method for enabling multi-arch : https://github.com/docker-library/official-images#multiple-architectures, however this repo isnt an official image yet. Would the first step be to make this an official image or are there any other ways the dockerhub docker-curl image can be enabled for ppc64le?