search

appsforartists / ambidex-example--bike-index

An example demonstrating how to utilize Ambidex.
16 stars 6 forks source link

getting Type errors when running the example #6

Closed amitport closed 9 years ago

amitport commented 9 years ago 
Uncaught TypeError: object is not a function
styles.js:1584 8
styles.js:509 __webpack_require__
styles.js:77 fnstyles.js:6815 94
styles.js:509 __webpack_require__
styles.js:77 fn
styles.js:10776 (anonymous function)
styles.js:10842 98
styles.js:509 __webpack_require__
styles.js:77 fn
styles.js:563 0
styles.js:509 __webpack_require__
styles.js:532 modules.(anonymous function)
styles.js:535 (anonymous function)

Uncaught TypeError: object is not a function
jsx.js:1575 (anonymous function)
jsx.js:509 __webpack_require__
jsx.js:77 fn
jsx.js:40063 (anonymous function)
jsx.js:509 __webpack_require__
jsx.js:77 fn
jsx.js:561 module.exports.module.deprecate
jsx.js:509 __webpack_require__
jsx.js:532 modules.(anonymous function)
jsx.js:535 (anonymous function)

(the site does not load correctly)

appsforartists commented 9 years ago

Sorry, that doesn't give me enough to help you. Have you checked to see what's on styles.js:1584 or jsx.js:1575?

Do you have any errors in your terminal? I'm investigating a report (#7) of Webpack misbehaving when the name is lowercase. Perhaps these issues are related.

Please share what you see when you go here:

http://bikeindex.local:8081/bundles/jsx.js

appsforartists commented 9 years ago

@amitport Does upgrading to ambidex@0.1.1 resolve your issue?

amitport commented 9 years ago

Hey just got around to re-try this...

Sorry, I can't reproduce this issue with ambidex@0.1.1, because in the meantime I upgraded to node@0.12 which caused node-sass@0.9.6 (used by ambidex->sass-loader) to fail to install (node-sass@0.9.6 does not support node@0.12)

appsforartists commented 9 years ago

This is a big motivator to stop including SASS by default in v0.2.0:

https://github.com/appsforartists/ambidex/tree/iojs