Closed sumitsum closed 3 years ago
Currently, we have a region selector in S3 datasources and the bucket is selected in S3 queries. This is very confusing since if I selected region-A in the datasource and turns out my bucket is in region-B, and my query fails. The mental model breaks here, because S3 buckets can ever belong to one and only one region. So, should we have both region and bucket configurations in the same place? Either both in the datasource, or both in the query configuration.
Extending that thought, can we completely do away with the region selector? If we can infer that from the bucket name, the user won't have to deal with entering a region at all, right? That would make the experience much smoother when dealing with S3 integration.
cc @ajinkyakulkarni @mohanarpit @Nikhil-Nandagopal
+1 @sumitsum @ajinkyakulkarni can we just let users enter / select a bucket in the datasource and infer everything else from here?
@trishaanand Hey team! Can you please add your planning poker estimates with ZenHub
@trishaanand @ohansFavour Hey team! Can you please add your planning poker estimates with ZenHub
Adding higher estimate point to ensure that we have tested with all the service providers and are not breaking anything for any of them.
Summary
From slack: