Closed andresailer closed 3 months ago
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
It did not trigger a build though. @andresailer do you want this merged now or do you still want to play with it?
I want to see the build run, I don't want this merged before the build ran successfully on alma9.
(I just ran a spellcheck on CMakeLists.txt, but I would have also just done a dummy change)
I want to see the build run, I don't want this merged before the build ran successfully on alma9.
OK, no problem, let me know if anything you may need
I think someone has to tell the bot to run the pipeline?
@adept-bot bot build
@phsft-bot bot build
sft-bot build
@phsft-bot build
@agheata Can you tell the bot to build?
I don't see the pipeline in the AdePT-CI. It normally starts automatically, maybe it detected that no dependencies were changed so no build is needed (just shooting in the dark)
I think I am not in some list of developers, so the bot doesn't start the pipeline unless someone verifies somehow
In such case it should prompt me to start the pipeline, which it doesn't. I managed to restart the pipeline for #289 https://lcgapp-services.cern.ch/spi-jenkins/job/AdePT-CI/661/
Which runs happily on centos7
Running on lcgapp-centos7-x86-64-gpu-03 in /build/sftnight/workspace/AdePT-CI
I just pushed to your branch, let's see
I just pushed to your branch, let's see
OK, so even if I push, it won't start the pipeline
Can you say @phsft-bot build
Without the tick marks?
@phsft-bot build
@phsft-bot rebuild
Nothing... The project is configured to send notifications to the webhook: https://github.com/apt-sim/AdePT/settings/hooks/277932760
Thanks for trying!
@phsft-bot test this please
@phsft-bot retest this please
@andresailer I see that the build was done, but still on centos7 ?
Running on lcgapp-centos7-x86-64-gpu-02 in /build/sftnight/workspace/AdePT-CI
No, this is alma9, the name of the machine is just the same as before.
OK, then it should be working.
Then I will also migrate the other GPU machine to alma9?
Then I will also migrate the other GPU machine to alma9?
Yes, why not
@andresailer it seems that now all nodes labeled cuda10
have disappeared, so the VecGeom pipeline stalls
@andresailer I guess we can close this since the CI is migrated?
Yes, you can also merge it :)
I want to see if the Alma9 CI is working