Open gregnazario opened 3 months ago
Hi, guys, how is this matter going? Currently, our multisig v2 + fee payer transactions cannot be simulated at all. A lot of gas was wasted due to the submission of incorrect payloads.
This issue is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove the stale
label or comment - otherwise this will be closed in 15 days.
Hi, guys, how is this matter going? Currently, our multisig v2 + fee payer transactions cannot be simulated at all. A lot of gas was wasted due to the submission of incorrect payloads.
@alex4506 , the AIP-92 should resolve this issue, and it's going to be released with v1.19.
🚀 Feature Request
Sponsored transactions, and any transaction where a publickey is not known, should be able to simulate. In the event of a 0x0 fee payer, there should be no gas simulation issues.
Motivation
Sponsored transactions can't be easily simulated without knowing the public key and address of the sponsor for a transaction. This is messy, since if you may not know the fee payer's address and public key if it's set to
0x0
to allow for any fee payer.Pitch
Describe the solution you'd like Simulation ignoring public keys, and if a fee payer is set, ignoring gas fees.
Describe alternatives you've considered ^
Are you willing to open a pull request? (See CONTRIBUTING) n/a
Additional context