Bill has now uploaded the HUI data to Aqualink. He thought it looked very informative, and the multi-site load seemed to work very well. He also had some feedback on some points that we should improve. I've looked at the video, read his questions, and tested some things on my own. Please reach out to me (Caesar) if you need a input. Below are some questions that he had, and he also made a video showing some of the points.
Heat Stress Analysis graph and temperature analysis graph. I can see why he doesn't understand what that blue line data that says "surface" is. It's temperature data from NOAA satellites. It would be more clear if we wrote "Surface temperature from NOAA Satellites" or "Surface temp, NOAA" or something similar.
Date range when clicking on "VIEW UPLOAD" below the green water quality card. All of the sites have a start date of 2016-06-14. I believe that this made the development much simpler. Is there another solution to automatically adjust the dates based on what data is available? If it's difficult and requires much time, we can keep it as is.
Questions from Bill
Graphs where X axis show the min/max of all points from all sites (initial graphs after selecting “view upload”), or even when X axis adjusts to “1 year” when selected, graph does not render all the data across the axis even when available. Just a short segment of the data at the starting point of the data.
Custom date ranges, such as July 2023 to present show no rendered graph, but curser reveals various data points (not in movie)
Date/Time info for each point is 10 hours ahead of the actual date/time collected. Since we collect at GMT-10 and supply our local date/time with each collect, you may be treating our date/time as GMT and adjusting to the site time zone, though not needed.
Minutes have been dropped from the measurements. Can the minutes be visible?
Comment from Caesar:
We should probably think about how we display the data on the graphs for water quality. As Bill pointed out, it doesn't look good now, and that's also because there's no continuous data streaming like the Sofar buoys. For these types of data, perhaps it would be better to connect the data points in the graph or something similar. This might also be a good improvement not only for HUI data but for all future water quality uploads if there is "spotty" data in some periods, but it is not continuously provided.
Hello,
Bill has now uploaded the HUI data to Aqualink. He thought it looked very informative, and the multi-site load seemed to work very well. He also had some feedback on some points that we should improve. I've looked at the video, read his questions, and tested some things on my own. Please reach out to me (Caesar) if you need a input. Below are some questions that he had, and he also made a video showing some of the points.
View the video here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gsjnkTsErYMQeZtJWhSiCUYvOGODZ-mw/view
Comments from me on his video:
Heat Stress Analysis graph and temperature analysis graph. I can see why he doesn't understand what that blue line data that says "surface" is. It's temperature data from NOAA satellites. It would be more clear if we wrote "Surface temperature from NOAA Satellites" or "Surface temp, NOAA" or something similar.
Date range when clicking on "VIEW UPLOAD" below the green water quality card. All of the sites have a start date of 2016-06-14. I believe that this made the development much simpler. Is there another solution to automatically adjust the dates based on what data is available? If it's difficult and requires much time, we can keep it as is.
Questions from Bill
Comment from Caesar: