Open dvnstrcklnd opened 3 years ago
@bjkeller I am finding that both sample types and container types lend themselves to categories. What do you think about having a polymorphic categorizable model?
Alternatively, search could take care of this problem.
there will probably be an ontology for containers out of the SD2 PAML effort. If we are able to use the ontology we might not need to build a class hierarchy of our own
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 8:12 AM Devin Strickland @.***> wrote:
@bjkeller https://github.com/bjkeller I am finding that both sample types and container types lend themselves to categories. What do you think about having a polymorphic categorizable model?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/aquariumbio/inventory-app/issues/4#issuecomment-857772451, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJZ3PJGOLNOKGDOPRNIMNTTR566FANCNFSM46MFZA3A .
-- Ben Keller Aquarium Project Lead Klavins Lab Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Washington @.*** 206-685-6726
Many containers come in a variety of types. For example, a 96-well plate can have a variety of shapes, surface treatments, and optical properties.
It might be useful to have a generic Categorizable