Closed karlprieb closed 2 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 67.43%. Comparing base (
74b16a7
) to head (e470c14
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Walkthrough
## Walkthrough The recent changes involve updates to constants and test cases within the `arweave` module and database-related test files. The most significant change is the modification of the `MAX_FORK_DEPTH` constant from 50 to 18. This change has cascading effects on test cases, where expected values and input parameters are adjusted accordingly to reflect the new `MAX_FORK_DEPTH` value. ## Changes | File | Summary | |----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | `src/arweave/constants.ts` | The `MAX_FORK_DEPTH` constant has been updated from 50 to 18. | | `src/database/standalone-sqlite.test.ts` | Test cases for `StandaloneSqliteDatabase` have been updated, including changes to the expected value of `stats.counts.stableBlocks` and the addition of new test data entries. | | `src/workers/block-importer.test.ts` | The input parameter for `blockImporter.importBlock()` has been modified from 51 to 19 in the test case. | ## Sequence Diagram(s) *No sequence diagrams are provided as the changes primarily involve constant updates and adjustments to test cases without significant modifications to control flow or feature implementation.*Recent review details
**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74b16a7f9d4032c9bd817526194c1f7fc8fcf481 and e470c145b787894dc453ec4b942abc18a5b0b066.Files selected for processing (3)
* src/arweave/constants.ts (1 hunks) * src/database/standalone-sqlite.test.ts (4 hunks) * src/workers/block-importer.test.ts (1 hunks)Additional comments not posted (4)
Share
- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)Tips
### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit