Closed hartwork closed 6 years ago
Merging #617 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #617 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 80.98% 80.98%
=======================================
Files 45 45
Lines 2918 2918
Branches 177 177
=======================================
Hits 2363 2363
Misses 497 497
Partials 58 58
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
cabot/cabotapp/views.py | 71.35% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
cabot/templates/base_public.html | 99.2% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 36d63a5...dd1360c. Read the comment docs.
I'm ok with this, I agree the branding's unnecessary.
@dbuxton what do you think?
Fine by me
Thanks!
Hi!
This pull request is probably controversial. It is meant to start a discussion.
It may be a personal thing, a European thing, a cultural thing, you tell me. When I use software I don't like to look at company names all the time, the same way I try to keep my life as free from advertisements as possible. There are places where branding feels organic and fits in but there are two places in Cabot where I personally find the branding to invasive: they get too much attention in a way that is hard to look by. For daily operation, that matters. So this pull request reduces use of the Arachnys brand a bit.
Branding that is kept untouched includes:
README.md
[Aa]rachnys\s+[Rr]ules
Branding that is removed:
by Arachnys
in the top navigation bar and page titlehttps://www.arachnys.com
for an HTTP check endpoint example URLI'm happy to introduce a switch
DEBRAND=False
or so todevelopment.env
and friends to make this change conditional if it's more of the right direction.What do you think?