arachnys / cabot

Self-hosted, easily-deployable monitoring and alerts service - like a lightweight PagerDuty
MIT License
5.59k stars 594 forks source link

Reduce branding a bit? #617

Closed hartwork closed 6 years ago

hartwork commented 6 years ago

Hi!

This pull request is probably controversial. It is meant to start a discussion.

It may be a personal thing, a European thing, a cultural thing, you tell me. When I use software I don't like to look at company names all the time, the same way I try to keep my life as free from advertisements as possible. There are places where branding feels organic and fits in but there are two places in Cabot where I personally find the branding to invasive: they get too much attention in a way that is hard to look by. For daily operation, that matters. So this pull request reduces use of the Arachnys brand a bit.

Branding that is kept untouched includes:

Branding that is removed:

I'm happy to introduce a switch DEBRAND=False or so to development.env and friends to make this change conditional if it's more of the right direction.

What do you think?

codecov[bot] commented 6 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #617 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #617   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.98%   80.98%           
=======================================
  Files          45       45           
  Lines        2918     2918           
  Branches      177      177           
=======================================
  Hits         2363     2363           
  Misses        497      497           
  Partials       58       58
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cabot/cabotapp/views.py 71.35% <ø> (ø) :arrow_up:
cabot/templates/base_public.html 99.2% <100%> (ø) :arrow_up:

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 36d63a5...dd1360c. Read the comment docs.

frankh commented 6 years ago

I'm ok with this, I agree the branding's unnecessary.

@dbuxton what do you think?

dbuxton commented 6 years ago

Fine by me

hartwork commented 6 years ago

Thanks!