Open Creativenauts opened 4 years ago
Things to consider:
Things to consider:
- What happens if all jurors in a round "opt-out"? Is another round of the same number of jurors drafted, until there's at least one juror contributing to a ruling? If so, who pays for the additional drafting? Or does the case automatically get "dismissed" (favoring either the defendant or plaintiff)?
- Should jurors who opt-out get penalized in some way, such as losing some/all of their portion of the subscription rewards?
- If there's an option to "opt-out", does that make the "Refuse to vote" choice redundant?
I think that a new round of jurors should be introduced until there is ample enough jurors for a case.
Jurors who refuse to vote should have some sort of penalty. This will make it so you are getting a committed pool of jurors.
I think there is a difference between refuse to vote and opt-out. For example, in the future when there are sub-courts, you would have the ability as a juror to opt-out of categories of subjects. Refuse to vote could be what is used for religious beliefs that goes against the jurors ideologies of life.
Hope this helps.
I think there is a difference between refuse to vote and opt-out. For example, in the future when there are sub-courts, you would have the ability as a juror to opt-out of categories of subjects. Refuse to vote could be what is used for religious beliefs that goes against the jurors ideologies of life.
To be clear, I'm specifically referring to the option Refuse to vote
which is currently one of the options a juror can select for their ruling. Refuse to vote
is treated the same as either In favor
or Against
with regards to potential rewards and penalties.
There should be a way to allow jurors to opt out of a case due to it going against their religious beliefs without putting their ANJ at risk.