Open yeqbfgxjiq opened 5 years ago
have you considered build on top of the proposed ACGP
that might be needing now just timing estimations for structuring cycles of proposal submissions and votes...
@sepu85
that might be needing now just timing estimations for structuring cycles of proposal submissions and votes...
I'm honestly not sure what you're referring to here.
The current official governance process of the Aragon Cooperative is the Temporary Aragon Cooperative Workflow (this repo). The ACGP has not been proposed to the Cooperative. If you'd like to augment the current governance model with the ACGP, I recommend creating a Meta Proposal.
Closing this Issue because the current scope has been satisfied.
Reopening this Issue, because I think it makes more sense to have the community vote on whether or not they feel like the Issue has been satisfied. The process of closing Issues was not officially documented in the workflow, so I'll go ahead and create a Meta Proposal for that now. My bad lol
Edit: addressing that loophole with a Meta Proposal here
This AGP-40 deliverable is vague. That being said, it's also extremely simple. The Aragon Cooperative needs a governance procedure that works. If we create a governance proceedure, we fulfill this deliverable. If we do not, we fail.
This repo, the Temporary Aragon Cooperative Workflow, fulfills the minimum requirements for this AGP-40 deliverable.
It would be great if we could go even further to create a TPS enabled workflow, but first we need a foundation we can build on.