🥑 ArangoDB is a native multi-model database with flexible data models for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.
I'm using the latest ArangoDB of the respective release series:
[ X] 3.4 Enterprise
[ ] self-compiled devel branch
Mode:
[ X] Cluster
[ ] Single-Server
Storage-Engine:
[ ] mmfiles
[X ] rocksdb
On this operating system:
[X ] own infrastructure (Vultr : Linux)
I would like to know (if possible) or request a feature for ArangoDB to use multiple storage drives on the same physical server. I'll give you my scenario as an example, I have 3 virtual machines with Vultr, and in each of those I have an ArangoDB instance running, clustered together - my total DB size is around 20TB, I can get Block Storage from Vultr up to 10TB, and I can get upto 10 Block Storage drives per Server, but the issue here is that ArangoDB doesn't support more than one HDD/SSD per instance (or atleast not properly documented), therefore my costs increase alot by purchasing a new virtual machine everytime I just want to increase the storage beyond 10TB per server in the case of Vutlr. Amazon EBS has a similar limit, 16TB per drive.
Hi,
currently this is neither possible with the mmfiles nor the rocksdb storage engine.
The only possible way is to add more DB-Server instances to the cluster, and give them another partition with another volume.
my environment running ArangoDB
I'm using the latest ArangoDB of the respective release series:
Mode:
Storage-Engine:
On this operating system:
I would like to know (if possible) or request a feature for ArangoDB to use multiple storage drives on the same physical server. I'll give you my scenario as an example, I have 3 virtual machines with Vultr, and in each of those I have an ArangoDB instance running, clustered together - my total DB size is around 20TB, I can get Block Storage from Vultr up to 10TB, and I can get upto 10 Block Storage drives per Server, but the issue here is that ArangoDB doesn't support more than one HDD/SSD per instance (or atleast not properly documented), therefore my costs increase alot by purchasing a new virtual machine everytime I just want to increase the storage beyond 10TB per server in the case of Vutlr. Amazon EBS has a similar limit, 16TB per drive.
Many Thanks