Open ararchch opened 4 months ago
This is documented behaviour of the weight
command in the user guide.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: As highlighted in my earlier report, I do not argue that this command was misrepresented in the UG. However I do belive that this is a feature flaw because it is not as well developed as it should be.
As indicated by the 2103T website:
As the command to edit or enter someone's weight involved typing weight
[index] and then their weight value, I can definitely foresee someone accidentally pressing enter after typing the first two parts, which would result in the deletion of the person's last recorded weight altogether. In fact I myself did this the first time I tried to edit weight.
This is compounded by the fact that once deleted it can never be recovered because it was a historical datapoint of someone's weight, as such it can significantly impact the tracking of a person's progress.
While I understand that this is listed in the UG, i think that adding a simple warning message via a pop up, or requesting for confirmation can go a long way in preventing this issue which I definitely think is relevant. I would understand if the team highlighted that this feature was not in scope for v1.4 because there might be other more important ones, but at some point down the line I do think that this is something that one should implement to improve user experience, so I disagree with the rejection of the bug.
Notation of weight
command:
User may type this accidentally, would be nice to warn them rather than removing datapoint.