Open ararchch opened 4 months ago
No details provided by team.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Duplicate persons with case insensitive name can be added, unlike what is stated in the UG
Based on UG, it is mentioned that name is case insensitive, so I would expect adding
John
andjohn
to be considered duplicates and throw an error. However, I was able to add bothJohn
andjohn
as seen below:
Steps:
add n/John p/98765432 e/john@gmail.com a/Clementi Ave 2 nt/BFF t/friend
add n/john p/98765432 e/john@gmail.com a/Clementi Ave 2 nt/BFF t/friend
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#4341] [original labels: type.FunctionalityBug severity.Low]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
We agree that we could have checked for case insensitivity more carefully. Thanks for pointing that out.
Thus, we accept this bug.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Overview Self explanatory - adding clients with same name and phone number, but one with an altered capitalisation is allowed, which contradicts UG.
Steps to reproduce
Expected behaviour
Actual behaviour
Potential solution
Screenshots
note that the values are same for all the fields (case insensitive)