Closed urapadmin closed 6 months ago
what's the state here? Have we used this?
@lbestock: Does that ring a bell for you? I am not sure why this is still open and if it is in any way still relevant.
It does ring a bell but I deem it unimportant. No one has asked about it again. And it is a relic of PACHA style worries about identifiers having all the info in them, whereas given the various methods of sorting in registration for instance it's not necessary at all. "Sample type" is itself vague - sort of a combination between material sampled and analysis to be performed on it. And both of those more precise things we do have. So I close this.
For pacha and pasu likewise: sample numbers like this: {context-id}-smp{T}{000}
prerequisites