archesproject / arches-dev-training

1 stars 2 forks source link

training materials feedback - Oct. 22 - AC #51

Open mradamcox opened 6 years ago

mradamcox commented 6 years ago

Overall Comments

We have a lot of information in the official Arches documentation regarding many of the topics and content covered here, but these slides make no reference to it. I think an effort to link to existing documentation where possible should be undertaken. CLI command reference, etc.

Generally, I think the course flows well overall, and I really like the in-depth examples and lab contents. However, after working through it, I think that consideration should be given to the following restructure (modules would be renamed of course):

A couple reasons for this suggestion

I think it would be good to clearly describe the end state of the project at the end of each module. What should be registered? What should be working correctly? etc.

Module-specific Comments

Note that all bold numbers correspond to the urls generated by the service on github pages. These are based on the state of the repo at commit 51ce70a77a215d7fc294af6dede1a3114b27d18b (Oct. 12).

Pre-course A: Deployment Considerations

General Comments

Proofreading

Pre-course B: KnockoutJS

General Comments

Proofreading

Pre-course C: Django

General Comments

Proofreading

Module 1: The Arches Platform

General Comments

Proofreading

Module 2: Introduction to Datatypes

General Comments

Module 3: Building a Custom Datatype

General Comments

Module 4: Introduction to Components

General Comments

Proofreading

Module 5: Widget Development

(no notes)

Module 6: Card Component Development

General Comments

Module 7: Report Template Development

(no notes)

Module 8: Projects and Packages

General Comments

Module 9: Arches Geospatial

General Comments

Proofreading

Module 10: Creating a Package

(no notes)

robgaston commented 6 years ago

@mradamcox Thanks for your comments!

We will work to factor in your proofreading edits.

RE: reorganizing the modules - unfortunately, I doubt that's feasible this time around as students have already been told that day one will be the optional "pre-course" stuff. Also, that would force students who don't need the pre-course material to attend those portions.

FYI, A lot of the content suggestions that you've made here are things that will be discussed in the class, but perhaps not captured in the slides. These are good notes, regardless.

Thanks again for the review!

mradamcox commented 6 years ago

@robgaston That makes sense about the module order, thanks for the extra background.