WorkPackage Icon

[jbsarrodie]

I'm tuning the workpackage small icon (the one used in the box notation) and came up with two variants:

1) Based on the very first proposal I made on LinkedIn:

2) Based on the version which ended up in the spec (which is slighly different):

@Phillipus Which one do you prefer ?

[Phillipus]

In the spec the arc joins the arrow line so it is almost a circle, which is what I tried to do in my attempt:

[jbsarrodie]

In the spec the arc joins the arrow line so it is almost a circle

That's a "flaw" in the spec ;-) It shouldn't appear as a full circle (inspired from the agile sprint icon).

I choose version (2) and added a bit more of the arc. This seems (to me) the best compromise:

Next: tuning the full icon

[Phillipus]

I prefer this one:

;-)

[ModelDeveloper-AG]

I prefer the first one as it looks a bit more balanced.

Regard,

Andrew Greff

On Tuesday, January 10, 2023, Jean-Baptiste Sarrodie < @.***> wrote:

I'm tuning the workpackage small icon (the one used in the box notation) and came up with two variants:

1.

Based on the very first proposal https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C4D2CAQFn1iqHgfhaIA/comment-image-shrink_8192_1280/0/1643634696862?e=1673956800&v=beta&t=3O3g4FHfpITfz848D1hW7U3vMil34reNYYHOYID9u4U I made on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:groupPost:50758-6892858604165181440?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28groupPost%3A50758-6892858604165181440%2C6893903585911140352%29&dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%286893903585911140352%2Curn%3Ali%3AgroupPost%3A50758-6892858604165181440%29 : [image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5757396/211570402-80813678-06d1-464f-a6cf-a70212b39944.png 2.

Based on the version which ended up in the spec https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate32-doc/#_Toc112155048 (which is slighly different): [image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5757396/211571830-d40c4aec-3f93-4469-84a4-0c0f8924b4c6.png

@Phillipus https://github.com/Phillipus Which one do you prefer ?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/archimatetool/archi/issues/893, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACSM7D34P3BADVHVWH6GCJTWRVUA3ANCNFSM6AAAAAATW2ZBP4 . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

[jbsarrodie]

@Phillipus Just noticed (but too late) that I pushed to master instead of a feature branch :-(

[Phillipus]

That just shows how confident you are in your change. :-)

I pushed a branch wp-figure and put master back to how it was with a force push. You'll need to pull and reset.

I got a mix of tabs and spaces in AbstractTextControlContainerFigure.java so hard to see what changed there. Maybe your Eclipse is set to use tabs instead of spaces.

[jbsarrodie]

I got a mix of tabs and spaces in AbstractTextControlContainerFigure.java so hard to see what changed there. Maybe your Eclipse is set to use tabs instead of spaces.

Maybe, I'll have a look (trying to get everything working again now that target has changed...)

[Phillipus]

I can reformat and force push the branch if you'd prefer.

[Phillipus]

Don't worry about the spaces thing, it had tabs in anywyay. I force pushed wp-figure again anyway.

[Phillipus]

I tested this and the change in #895 and it's all good by me. Let's commit this and get Archi 5 out!

[jbsarrodie]

Let's commit this and get Archi 5 out!

waiiiiiiittttttt, I still have to fix the meaning figure

[Phillipus]

I still have to fix the meaning figure

What do you, er, mean? Oh yeah I forgot about that one, needs an extra bubble...