Open kirkpabk opened 1 year ago
What are your thoughts?
How long would such a thing take and who would develop it?
Interesting question. I was planning on devoting a bit of time. But I haven't gathered all of the requirements or blockers. There are bound to be a few--but once the feasibility and interest are there, this would be a fun little project.
From a preliminary look, we would need some sort of event model from Archi to expose firing of (at a minimum) canvas events for elements/toolboxes and mouse interactivity within the scope of the canvas. Once those are exposed, hooking into those makes the rest fairly easy and "generic" in a sense.
The other aspects are just enabling the controller to admit, eject workers, enable/disable certain activities of workers, "summon" workers to a particular zoomed area of a canvas, and etc.
These are all fairly simple--once the event model is created...
Can you think of any other areas for the basic concept?
Was looking at the possibility of an approach at collaboration that supports teaming architects and non-architects within the Archi tool in a live way.
With a new Archi plugin and possibly a hub (potentially containerized as is with the Convergence project: https://convergence.io/ or something like Mirro), a Lead organizer would create a collaborative session and distribute a link. Collaborators would join and be able to interact with the Lead's Archi screen (with configurable limits, of course) in real-time.
Even with coArchi (which is great, by the way), this is still asynchronous. We don't have a real-time or near real-time way to collaborate with groups. In today's high-paced world, this sort of collaboration is becoming the norm.
Because of the jArchi strength to command nearly every feature of a model in a "live way," using something like Convergence SDK with JavaScript seems like a very natural fit and evolution. Additional benefits could be live chat capture for team discussions and such.
To me the simplest architecture model would be controller/worker wherein, the controller would be responsible for saving and publishing to GIT or a database. But depending upon the worker implementation, it could be local visual only canvas or a mirror copy of the xml. Just thinking out loud...
What are your thoughts?