Open jimenofonseca opened 4 years ago
hi @JIMENOFONSECA , is there a timeline you are thinking of? since the resource we have now in the CEA team is quite limited during this "hibernation period", we can probably only schedule this in after July 2020. we can revisit this in the roadmap planning event, during which, we can decide together whether this should be included in the roadmap and at when.
I was thinking about execution in a month time (acknowledging the hibernation period). Do you think we could come up with something by then? I am glad to help. For example I can take the centralised opts and somebody the decentralised one? I can also provide the mailing-list for advertisement. We can depart from an scenario where users already had run demand, local potentials, and thermal networks, so we focus on the optimisation. What do you think?
Dr. Jimeno Fonseca Senior Researcher SEC | ETH Zurich
Read more about City Energy Dynamicshttps://www.jimenofonseca.com/
On 16 Apr 2020, 5:47 PM +0800, Shanshan Hsieh notifications@github.com, wrote:
hi @JIMENOFONSECAhttps://github.com/JIMENOFONSECA , is there a timeline you are thinking of? since the resource we have now in the CEA team is quite limited during this "hibernation period", we can probably only schedule this in after July 2020. we can revisit this in the roadmap planning event, during which, we can decide together whether this should be included in the roadmap and at when.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/architecture-building-systems/CityEnergyAnalyst/issues/2695#issuecomment-614539649, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEOXAXCN56LKSJSFGMG723RM3HZJANCNFSM4MJDVMUA.
There is no capacity from my side to take up any story point on this issue until the end of May. It might be possible to meet the timeline if you would like to take over this issue. I apologize, but I cannot commit to this at the moment. We can have a short discussion on how to proceed.
No problem. Then it is settled. We can revisit this issue later on once people have time. Feel free to move on with the issue. On 17 Apr 2020, 13:05 +0800, Shanshan Hsieh notifications@github.com, wrote:
There is no capacity from my side to take up any story point on this issue until the end of May. It might be possible to meet the timeline if you would like to take over this issue. I apologize, but I cannot commit to this at the moment. We can have a short discussion on how to proceed.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/architecture-building-systems/CityEnergyAnalyst/issues/2695#issuecomment-615044244, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEOXAQ7N76C5M6WA2LHV7DRM7PSFANCNFSM4MJDVMUA.
@jimenofonseca Are you including this in your training in Sweden? We can discuss on June 20. Best we have @MatNif on board.
Yes :-)!Best,JimenoOn 15 Jun 2023, at 11:36, Zhongming Shi @.***> wrote: @jimenofonseca Are you including this in your training in Sweden? We can discuss on June 20. Best we have @MatNif on board.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Describe the feature you would like to have 2h webinar with users of CEA walking through theory and then optimization with CEA.
Describe the end purpose of this feature So the CEA community knows how to use this amazing feature (nobody seems to be able to do it beyond the core team at this point.
Describe the end-user of this feature Everyone: Researcher, a Student, or a Practitioner. The request was made by a research team at Concordia University lead by Prof. U. Eicker. I am facilitating.
Provide Aditional information if possible I count with the account for webinars from SEC which we can use for the event.