archivematica / Issues

Issues repository for the Archivematica project
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
16 stars 1 forks source link

Problem: The store AIP decision doesn't convey that it's a good opportunity for users to review and validate the METS #548

Open ross-spencer opened 5 years ago

ross-spencer commented 5 years ago

Please describe the problem you'd like to be solved.

Giving users the opportunity to review the AIP package, including looking at and validating the METS file seems to be encoded in ways that Archivematica is taught and demonstrated. As a user, it would be great if this job were clearer to say that this is an important opportunity to do that before storing the METS.

Describe the solution you'd like to see implemented.

The decision point seems to be doing this:

Which might add a little more context.

Describe alternatives you've considered.

We could leave this as is, as it's a tried and true practice. There may also be better alternatives to the one I outlined above.


For Artefactual use: Please make sure these steps are taken before moving this issue from Review to Verified in Waffle:

ross-spencer commented 4 years ago

Related to https://github.com/archivematica/Issues/issues/655 -- should the PIM (Premis in METS) service be replaced in the near future, then this "enhancement" would not be necessary.