Closed UhhhWaitWhat closed 2 years ago
It should be possible but I avoided it for simplicity and to avoid a lifetime bound on the Alpm struct.
Currently you can use rc and refcell to achieve this sp doesn't that not work for you?
Yeah I guess an Rc should work, it just... doesn't feel great :D
But I get your bid for simplicity, so I'll do with what I have. Thank you for the quick response.
Hi everybody,
Is there a possibility to make the callbacks (e.g. the params passed to
set_log_cb
) have a shorter lifetime (e.g. the lifetime of theAlpm
instance) than'static
? I don't know enough about libalpm itself to know if this is a possibility and if we have a guarantee of the callbacks never being called after the handle is destroyed. But as far as I see it, the moment theAlpm
instance is dropped, it takes all the callbacks with it anyways, right?The reason I am asking is, that a
'static
lifetime prevents me from doing pretty much anything but logging the passed log messages. If I'd like to send the messages to a database, suddenly my database handle needs to have a static lifetime etc.If this is an extremely nonsensical and/or impossible idea, please just disregard it :)
Thanks for your work on this library,
Florian