Closed kiilerix closed 1 year ago
I don't see anything in the failed checks that seems related to the changes.
I don't see anything in the failed checks that seems related to the changes.
Agreed. I'll try and see what's going on with it.
Thanks for merging. (But FWIW, I much prefer rebasing of my clean history instead of squashing.)
It would be convenient for me if the changes were available in an official 1.4.1 release. Any thoughts about when that will happen? Will you consider making a release just for this reason?
Thanks for merging. (But FWIW, I much prefer rebasing of my clean history instead of squashing.)
I exclusively use squash merging because it makes it easier for me as a maintainer. Some contributors to some of my crates will have an unclean history containing useless commit messages such as "oops", "try again (again (again))", and "fix bug". Everyone works differently (you used a force-push to keep commits clean, while I usually choose not to, so that history is preserved during the review process up until merge), and I don't want to force volunteers into cleaning up their history into something readable, or working a specific way. So, I give everyone the same treatment, because it makes it easier for me when volunteering to maintain this project and other crates. If this is something that would turn you away from making future contributions, I will re-think my stance.
It would be convenient for me if the changes were available in an official 1.4.1 release. Any thoughts about when that will happen? Will you consider making a release just for this reason?
This is already in progress; The release will happen tonight Americas/Chicago time.
Version 1.4.1 is now released with the patch.
The actual license is not only relevant for contributing to the project, but even more for using the library. The license files should thus be shipped in the crate like most other crates do.
I would like to include whoami in Fedora as new dependency of Mercurial. That needs the license files in the crate.
(Also, most other rust projects seem to leave out the .txt extension and the license version from the file names. For consistency, it would thus be even better if the license files were named
LICENSE_APACHE
,LICENSE_BOOST
, andLICENSE_MIT
.)