ardatan / whatwg-node

Helper packages to create platform agnostic applications and libraries without worrying about the lack of WHATWG support in Node.js
MIT License
154 stars 31 forks source link

chore(deps): update all non-major dependencies #1426

Closed renovate[bot] closed 1 month ago

renovate[bot] commented 1 month ago

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
esbuild 0.21.5 -> 0.23.0 age adoption passing confidence
eslint-plugin-promise 6.2.0 -> 6.4.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

evanw/esbuild (esbuild) ### [`v0.23.0`](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#0230) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.22.0...v0.23.0) ***This release deliberately contains backwards-incompatible changes.*** To avoid automatically picking up releases like this, you should either be pinning the exact version of `esbuild` in your `package.json` file (recommended) or be using a version range syntax that only accepts patch upgrades such as `^0.22.0` or `~0.22.0`. See npm's documentation about [semver](https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v6/using-npm/semver/) for more information. - Revert the recent change to avoid bundling dependencies for node ([#​3819](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3819)) This release reverts the recent change in version 0.22.0 that made `--packages=external` the default behavior with `--platform=node`. The default is now back to `--packages=bundle`. I've just been made aware that Amazon doesn't pin their dependencies in their "AWS CDK" product, which means that whenever esbuild publishes a new release, many people (potentially everyone?) using their SDK around the world instantly starts using it without Amazon checking that it works first. This change in version 0.22.0 happened to break their SDK. I'm amazed that things haven't broken before this point. This revert attempts to avoid these problems for Amazon's customers. Hopefully Amazon will pin their dependencies in the future. In addition, this is probably a sign that esbuild is used widely enough that it now needs to switch to a more complicated release model. I may have esbuild use a beta channel model for further development. - Fix preserving collapsed JSX whitespace ([#​3818](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3818)) When transformed, certain whitespace inside JSX elements is ignored completely if it collapses to an empty string. However, the whitespace should only be ignored if the JSX is being transformed, not if it's being preserved. This release fixes a bug where esbuild was previously incorrectly ignoring collapsed whitespace with `--jsx=preserve`. Here is an example: ```jsx // Original code // Old output (with --jsx=preserve) ; // New output (with --jsx=preserve) ; ``` ### [`v0.22.0`](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#0220) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.21.5...v0.22.0) **This release deliberately contains backwards-incompatible changes.** To avoid automatically picking up releases like this, you should either be pinning the exact version of `esbuild` in your `package.json` file (recommended) or be using a version range syntax that only accepts patch upgrades such as `^0.21.0` or `~0.21.0`. See npm's documentation about [semver](https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v6/using-npm/semver/) for more information. - Omit packages from bundles by default when targeting node ([#​1874](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/1874), [#​2830](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/2830), [#​2846](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/2846), [#​2915](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/2915), [#​3145](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3145), [#​3294](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3294), [#​3323](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3323), [#​3582](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3582), [#​3809](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3809), [#​3815](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3815)) This breaking change is an experiment. People are commonly confused when using esbuild to bundle code for node (i.e. for `--platform=node`) because some packages may not be intended for bundlers, and may use node-specific features that don't work with a bundler. Even though esbuild's "getting started" instructions say to use `--packages=external` to work around this problem, many people don't read the documentation and don't do this, and are then confused when it doesn't work. So arguably this is a bad default behavior for esbuild to have if people keep tripping over this. With this release, esbuild will now omit packages from the bundle by default when the platform is `node` (i.e. the previous behavior of `--packages=external` is now the default in this case). *Note that your dependencies must now be present on the file system when your bundle is run.* If you don't want this behavior, you can do `--packages=bundle` to allow packages to be included in the bundle (i.e. the previous default behavior). Note that `--packages=bundle` doesn't mean all packages are bundled, just that packages are allowed to be bundled. You can still exclude individual packages from the bundle using `--external:` even when `--packages=bundle` is present. The `--packages=` setting considers all import paths that "look like" package imports in the original source code to be package imports. Specifically import paths that don't start with a path segment of `/` or `.` or `..` are considered to be package imports. The only two exceptions to this rule are [subpath imports](https://nodejs.org/api/packages.html#subpath-imports) (which start with a `#` character) and TypeScript path remappings via `paths` and/or `baseUrl` in `tsconfig.json` (which are applied first). - Drop support for older platforms ([#​3802](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3802)) This release drops support for the following operating systems: - Windows 7 - Windows 8 - Windows Server 2008 - Windows Server 2012 This is because the Go programming language dropped support for these operating system versions in [Go 1.21](https://go.dev/doc/go1.21#windows), and this release updates esbuild from Go 1.20 to Go 1.22. Note that this only affects the binary esbuild executables that are published to the `esbuild` npm package. It's still possible to compile esbuild's source code for these older operating systems. If you need to, you can compile esbuild for yourself using an older version of the Go compiler (before Go version 1.21). That might look something like this: git clone https://github.com/evanw/esbuild.git cd esbuild go build ./cmd/esbuild ./esbuild.exe --version In addition, this release increases the minimum required node version for esbuild's JavaScript API from node 12 to node 18. Node 18 is the oldest version of node that is still being supported (see node's [release schedule](https://nodejs.org/en/about/previous-releases) for more information). This increase is because of an incompatibility between the JavaScript that the Go compiler generates for the `esbuild-wasm` package and versions of node before node 17.4 (specifically the `crypto.getRandomValues` function). - Update `await using` behavior to match TypeScript TypeScript 5.5 subtly changes the way `await using` behaves. This release updates esbuild to match these changes in TypeScript. You can read more about these changes in [microsoft/TypeScript#58624](https://togithub.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/58624). - Allow `es2024` as a target environment The ECMAScript 2024 specification was just approved, so it has been added to esbuild as a possible compilation target. You can read more about the features that it adds here: . The only addition that's relevant for esbuild is the regular expression `/v` flag. With `--target=es2024`, regular expressions that use the `/v` flag will now be passed through untransformed instead of being transformed into a call to `new RegExp`. - Publish binaries for OpenBSD on 64-bit ARM ([#​3665](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3665), [#​3674](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/pull/3674)) With this release, you should now be able to install the `esbuild` npm package in OpenBSD on 64-bit ARM, such as on an Apple device with an M1 chip. This was contributed by [@​ikmckenz](https://togithub.com/ikmckenz). - Publish binaries for WASI (WebAssembly System Interface) preview 1 ([#​3300](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3300), [#​3779](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/pull/3779)) The upcoming WASI (WebAssembly System Interface) standard is going to be a way to run WebAssembly outside of a JavaScript host environment. In this scenario you only need a `.wasm` file without any supporting JavaScript code. Instead of JavaScript providing the APIs for the host environment, the WASI standard specifies a "system interface" that WebAssembly code can access directly (e.g. for file system access). Development versions of the WASI specification are being released using preview numbers. The people behind WASI are currently working on preview 2 but the Go compiler has [released support for preview 1](https://go.dev/blog/wasi), which from what I understand is now considered an unsupported legacy release. However, some people have requested that esbuild publish binary executables that support WASI preview 1 so they can experiment with them. This release publishes esbuild precompiled for WASI preview 1 to the `@esbuild/wasi-preview1` package on npm (specifically the file `@esbuild/wasi-preview1/esbuild.wasm`). This binary executable has not been tested and won't be officially supported, as it's for an old preview release of a specification that has since moved in another direction. If it works for you, great! If not, then you'll likely have to wait for the ecosystem to evolve before using esbuild with WASI. For example, it sounds like perhaps WASI preview 1 doesn't include support for opening network sockets so esbuild's local development server is unlikely to work with WASI preview 1. - Warn about `onResolve` plugins not setting a path ([#​3790](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3790)) Plugins that return values from `onResolve` without resolving the path (i.e. without setting either `path` or `external: true`) will now cause a warning. This is because esbuild only uses return values from `onResolve` if it successfully resolves the path, and it's not good for invalid input to be silently ignored. - Add a new Go API for running the CLI with plugins ([#​3539](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/pull/3539)) With esbuild's Go API, you can now call `cli.RunWithPlugins(args, plugins)` to pass an array of esbuild plugins to be used during the build process. This allows you to create a CLI that behaves similarly to esbuild's CLI but with additional Go plugins enabled. This was contributed by [@​edewit](https://togithub.com/edewit).
eslint-community/eslint-plugin-promise (eslint-plugin-promise) ### [`v6.4.0`](https://togithub.com/eslint-community/eslint-plugin-promise/compare/4dfc8a77c0592a19d467a268708678114c3c7c2b...ecbce9faef0c8e05636287cf9c851949be6d70cc) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/eslint-community/eslint-plugin-promise/compare/v6.3.0...v6.4.0) ### [`v6.3.0`](https://togithub.com/eslint-community/eslint-plugin-promise/compare/v6.2.0...4dfc8a77c0592a19d467a268708678114c3c7c2b) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/eslint-community/eslint-plugin-promise/compare/v6.2.0...v6.3.0)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.



This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

@benchmarks/node-fetch results (consumeBody)

   ✓ active_handles.................: avg=139.875645 min=97      med=140     max=201      p(90)=160     p(95)=165    
     data_received..................: 24 MB  793 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 15 MB  508 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=3.76µs     min=611ns   med=1.4µs   max=17.51ms  p(90)=2.01µs  p(95)=2.36µs 
     http_req_connecting............: avg=1.76µs     min=0s      med=0s      max=4.77ms   p(90)=0s      p(95)=0s     
     http_req_duration..............: avg=19.22ms    min=2.29ms  med=18.73ms max=468.78ms p(90)=24.8ms  p(95)=27.44ms
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=19.22ms    min=2.29ms  med=18.73ms max=468.78ms p(90)=24.8ms  p(95)=27.44ms
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%  ✓ 0           ✗ 155482
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=35.18µs    min=9.26µs  med=23.79µs max=21.54ms  p(90)=39.17µs p(95)=47.81µs
     http_req_sending...............: avg=12.23µs    min=3.16µs  med=6.69µs  max=18.68ms  p(90)=10.07µs p(95)=15.77µs
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s         min=0s      med=0s      max=0s       p(90)=0s      p(95)=0s     
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=19.17ms    min=2.25ms  med=18.69ms max=468.68ms p(90)=24.75ms p(95)=27.35ms
     http_reqs......................: 155482 5181.998295/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=38.56ms    min=12.42ms med=37.37ms max=489.36ms p(90)=43.8ms  p(95)=48.95ms
     iterations.....................: 77713  2590.065946/s
     vus............................: 100    min=100       max=100 
     vus_max........................: 100    min=100       max=100 
github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

@benchmarks/node-fetch results (noConsumeBody)

   ✓ active_handles.................: avg=138.757434 min=103      med=139     max=200      p(90)=160     p(95)=166    
     data_received..................: 25 MB  842 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 16 MB  545 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=4.15µs     min=621ns    med=1.45µs  max=19.48ms  p(90)=2.02µs  p(95)=2.36µs 
     http_req_connecting............: avg=1.94µs     min=0s       med=0s      max=6.51ms   p(90)=0s      p(95)=0s     
     http_req_duration..............: avg=18.1ms     min=1.17ms   med=17.71ms max=181.01ms p(90)=23.78ms p(95)=26.21ms
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=18.1ms     min=1.17ms   med=17.71ms max=181.01ms p(90)=23.78ms p(95)=26.21ms
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%  ✓ 0           ✗ 165097
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=37.93µs    min=7.27µs   med=23.74µs max=23.68ms  p(90)=39.46µs p(95)=49.19µs
     http_req_sending...............: avg=11.94µs    min=3.01µs   med=6.84µs  max=18.74ms  p(90)=10.33µs p(95)=16.68µs
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s         min=0s       med=0s      max=0s       p(90)=0s      p(95)=0s     
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=18.05ms    min=888.16µs med=17.67ms max=180.62ms p(90)=23.74ms p(95)=26.11ms
     http_reqs......................: 165097 5502.723679/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=36.32ms    min=5.52ms   med=35.32ms max=199.95ms p(90)=41.57ms p(95)=46.28ms
     iterations.....................: 82526  2750.611909/s
     vus............................: 100    min=100       max=100 
     vus_max........................: 100    min=100       max=100 
github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

@benchmarks/server results (native)

     ✓ no-errors
     ✓ expected-result

   ✓ checks.........................: 100.00% ✓ 228028      ✗ 0     
     data_received..................: 23 MB   764 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 9.1 MB  304 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=1.45µs   min=912ns    med=1.25µs   max=181.31µs p(90)=1.94µs   p(95)=2.12µs  
     http_req_connecting............: avg=1ns      min=0s       med=0s       max=133.02µs p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_duration..............: avg=199.49µs min=149.93µs med=187.3µs  max=13.78ms  p(90)=211.65µs p(95)=220.47µs
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=199.49µs min=149.93µs med=187.3µs  max=13.78ms  p(90)=211.65µs p(95)=220.47µs
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%   ✓ 0           ✗ 114014
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=25.74µs  min=13.61µs  med=24.46µs  max=2.75ms   p(90)=31.19µs  p(95)=33.16µs 
     http_req_sending...............: avg=6.6µs    min=4.19µs   med=6.13µs   max=280.79µs p(90)=8.33µs   p(95)=8.99µs  
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=167.14µs min=123.3µs  med=154.54µs max=13.7ms   p(90)=176.32µs p(95)=184.52µs
     http_reqs......................: 114014  3800.272854/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=258.56µs min=199.13µs med=245.6µs  max=13.89ms  p(90)=273.02µs p(95)=284.35µs
     iterations.....................: 114014  3800.272854/s
     vus............................: 1       min=1         max=1   
     vus_max........................: 1       min=1         max=1   
github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

@benchmarks/server results (ponyfill)

     ✓ no-errors
     ✓ expected-result

   ✓ checks.........................: 100.00% ✓ 299924      ✗ 0     
     data_received..................: 30 MB   985 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 12 MB   400 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=1.36µs   min=862ns    med=1.18µs   max=289.18µs p(90)=1.83µs   p(95)=1.99µs  
     http_req_connecting............: avg=0ns      min=0s       med=0s       max=125.18µs p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_duration..............: avg=139.03µs min=89.73µs  med=133.82µs max=7.82ms   p(90)=155.29µs p(95)=161.61µs
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=139.03µs min=89.73µs  med=133.82µs max=7.82ms   p(90)=155.29µs p(95)=161.61µs
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%   ✓ 0           ✗ 149962
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=24.1µs   min=11.63µs  med=22.95µs  max=1.31ms   p(90)=29.9µs   p(95)=31.98µs 
     http_req_sending...............: avg=6.17µs   min=4.02µs   med=5.4µs    max=589.91µs p(90)=8.02µs   p(95)=8.57µs  
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=108.76µs min=69.62µs  med=102.98µs max=7.56ms   p(90)=121.73µs p(95)=126.9µs 
     http_reqs......................: 149962  4998.566375/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=195.71µs min=138.63µs med=189.68µs max=7.96ms   p(90)=214.35µs p(95)=222.76µs
     iterations.....................: 149962  4998.566375/s
     vus............................: 1       min=1         max=1   
     vus_max........................: 1       min=1         max=1