Closed aentinger closed 1 year ago
Patch coverage: 100.00%
and project coverage change: +0.16%
:tada:
Comparison is base (
84b98c7
) 95.77% compared to head (e091080
) 95.93%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Hi @facchinm :coffee: :wave:
This PR is required by
which support both standard (11-Bit) and extended (29-Bit) CAN IDs by the respective platform libraries.
I'm not a :100: on the proposed design, especially id
still being a publicly exposed member variable. Personally I'd like to turn id
private, something that would also work with both aforementioned pull requests, but may cause problems for users which have already adopted the new CAN API. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.
especially id still being a publicly exposed member variable.
I'm ok for leaving it public to keep the APIs space simpler and allow some optimizations for libraries adopting this.
… following a <linux/can.h> inspired approach.