codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
d8e967b) 42.54% compared to head (7814917) 42.54%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #205 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 42.54% 42.54% ======================================= Files 26 26 Lines 1455 1455 ======================================= Hits 619 619 Misses 775 775 Partials 61 61 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unit | `42.54% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=arduino#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Arduino tooling projects use a standardized infrastructure. A centralized collection of reusable infrastructure assets is maintained in a dedicated repository:
https://github.com/arduino/tooling-project-assets
Since the time this project's infrastructure was installed, some advancements have been made in the upstream "template" assets.
One such advancement was the update of the source URL for the taskfile JSON schema. It was necessary to pull that change into this repository to fix the spurious failure of the "Check Taskfiles" workflow runs:
https://github.com/arduino/libraries-repository-engine/actions/runs/5584881310/jobs/10206876396#step:5:11
While I was at it, I did a comprehensive sync of the project's infrastructure, bringing it up to date with the state of the art upstream assets. See the individual commit messages for explanations of the reasons for the various changes this introduced.
The workflow runs triggered by this PR will provide a basic validation of most of the changes. Unlike the rest of the workflows, the "Release" workflow is not triggered by the submission of a PR, so I did a demonstration release in my fork using the workflow with the changes that are proposed here: