Closed aremazeilles closed 4 years ago
For the moment, it seems fine. Is it still a WIP?
I think it is ok. What I don´t like, is that then, from the filename, we don´t know whether a file contain a single, or multiple information. But Let´s start with it....
In #27, I proposed this: 'name of the file: subject_N_run_R_wrench_tagOrID if we have files from different sensors and subject_N_run_R_wrench if only one file containing the info of all the sensors.'
This way you could differentiate.
This is what I wrote in the file, but I assume we make such distinction only if the tesbed uses several force sensors. If you have a single force sensor in the experimentation, then I would not put a tag in addition to the label "wrench".
But then, given a [...]_wrench
file, you don´t know if it contains a single sensor reading (because the testbed only involves one), or several (because the testbed involves several sensors, and we decided to place all in a single file).
This is what I wrote in the file, but I assume we make such distinction only if the tesbed uses several force sensors. If you have a single force sensor in the experimentation, then I would not put a tag in addition to the label "wrench".
If we find interesting to differentiate without opening then we should propose to add tag
Let´s keep it as is, and keep in mind that possible adjustment if we see we need it...
Fix #27