arfc / 2018-bae-benchmark

Benchmark paper for Cyclus
GNU General Public License v3.0
1 stars 2 forks source link

Comments and suggestions - gwen #9

Closed gwenchee closed 6 years ago

gwenchee commented 6 years ago

Overall comments: 1) You should be more consistent with referring to the original benchmark and your new one. You bounce between verification study and benchmark and previous benchmark. 2) You should pick a tense for referring to your study, I changed what i could to past tense. 3) I think you might have overused "note".

Attachment with some comments: 2018-bae-benchmark-gwenedits.pdf

jbae11 commented 6 years ago

@gwenchee Thank you so much! I pushed the edited files!