Closed nsryan2 closed 7 months ago
No problem! I think it was worth it. One of these days, I want to get around to real docs for the scripts at least, and this will help out when I get around to that. I'm not sure either which should be merged first. In #152, you get rid of some of need for changes in #155, so maybe #155 should be first?
I don't think there are any big conflicts between the changes in this PR and the changes in #152, but I will wait to merge this one until after 152 is merged to minimize some of the chaos, given the number of files changes in this PR.
@nsryan2 did you use git mv
to change the name of the directory?
@nsryan2 did you use
git mv
to change the name of the directory?
I did not, should I have? I'm not familiar with that command.
What sequence of commands did you use to rename the folder?
What sequence of commands did you use to rename the folder?
I renamed the input folder scenarios and committed the changes for all the tracked files with git add -u
and a normal commit statement
Bumping this for @nsryan2 to resolve any conflicts from merging #152
Bumping this for resolving conflicts.
Closing this to make our lives easier, going to redo it over the new changes
This PR closes #153, by renaming the top-level
input/
folder toscenarios/
. It also restructuresscenarios/
to include a README with a brief project description from my limited understanding of each project (like a sentence tops), and moves all theEGxx-EGyy/
folders into one project folder.I want to clarify that part of the reason there are so many files involved in this change is that I also updated any hard-coded file paths that used to include the top-level
input/
.This also addresses a comment from @samgdotson in #152 about the naming scheme.