Project 1 evaluation

[mbutler808]

Project Rubric

Your audience is the user, members of the general public who may want to use your data and/or code. To be useful, your code and documentation must be clear to naive users (people familiar with R, but not with this project).

Elements:

1. Your github repo, organized following the project template.
2. Your modified code, quarto, and README files, organized in the repo.
3. Your output files (any requested output, i.e., .csv, .html, .docx, .pdf files) in their proper places in the repo.

Criteria	Evaluation	Scoring	Points	Comments
Right	Code runs without Error - Must be YES	0/10	10
	Code produces correct output	0-5	4	Very nice, but should include data checks after each cleaning step. How will others know it worked? Document it.
Readable	Code is readable (good use of white space, etc.)	0-5	5
	Code is understandable (good naming conventions, concise informative comments)	very nice
Reproducible	READMEs document project organization	0-5	3	ok
	READMEs list contents of each directory		missing
	READMEs explain the order to run the code/quarto in order to reproduce analysis		not indicated
Aesthetics	Files are free of unnecessary clutter (assignment instructions, etc.)	0-5	3	code good, not all READMEs updated
	Code is elegant (not required, but a bonus)			very nice
Bottom Line		30	25	very nice! Just a bit more documentation

[mbutler808]

You can see an example solution here: https://github.com/mbutler808/Project-1-solution