Open vr00n opened 6 years ago
Those really aren't the relevant categories of municipal professional services work. These operate at a different level of abstraction
Would be hard pressed to find any muni contracts that use those terms. SCAG is moving very strongly in this direction and their most relevant opportunity is "big data research: demographic change, housing choice and socioeconomic trends"
Usually the data work is framed in terms of the domains and the tooling is irrelevant. See items like "transit survey feasibility study" or "regional transportation plan" https://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanyID=14434
The goal here is to work towards a common vocabulary to share digital work with local government.
State and Federal governments are perhaps not in the scope of this but open to discuss.
You and I have famously disagreed on what the term Algorithm
even means in a municipal operations context.
It is this semantic dissonance that I believe is the root of the problem and causes friction when defining needs and delivering simple digital solutions to LOCAL agencies.
A Transit feasibility study
is too broad and can contain door to door surveys and other non-digital work.
So What are the digital components of a typical Transit feasibility Study
?
Data Collection - Car Counts, Pedestrian Counts
Data Integration - Integrating GIS shapefiles with count data
Data Analysis - Analyzing trends over time
Data Visualization - Visualizing these trends across different locations to support key questions
Say Local Government Agency {x} needs {y} digital service. How best can the needs be expressed?
These services could range from:
Construct contract. Boom