To associate the nodes, I edited my node, which pops up the _Edit Premise_ webpage.
Here, I scrolled down to the _Related Argument:_ field, and entered the permalink of the other node there.
But this causes an error.
Worse, this error page is not in English, so it does not help the English-speaking users. (_BUG!_)
Maalesef! Beklenmeyen bir sorun oluştu.
Tekrar Dene | Hata Olarak Bildir | Anasayfaya Dön |
I realize that there is a possibility of misinterpretation here:
This field may accept the URL of an _argument_ such as this; but it may not accept a node (which is a "premise"; not an "argument").
If so, then there are two separate bugs here:
1 Arguman should allow linking to a premise (not only argument) In fact, it is natural to link premises rather than arguments. ( #275)
2 Arguman should be able to handle the error, rather than throwing an exception.
I wanted to associate my node to this node.
The reason is that I see both these premises as co-premises (Dependent premises).
To associate the nodes, I edited my node, which pops up the _Edit Premise_ webpage. Here, I scrolled down to the _Related Argument:_ field, and entered the permalink of the other node there.
But this causes an error.
Worse, this error page is not in English, so it does not help the English-speaking users. (_BUG!_)
Maalesef! Beklenmeyen bir sorun oluştu. Tekrar Dene | Hata Olarak Bildir | Anasayfaya Dön |
I realize that there is a possibility of misinterpretation here: This field may accept the URL of an _argument_ such as this; but it may not accept a node (which is a "premise"; not an "argument").
If so, then there are two separate bugs here: 1 Arguman should allow linking to a premise (not only argument) In fact, it is natural to link premises rather than arguments. ( #275) 2 Arguman should be able to handle the error, rather than throwing an exception.