arguman / arguman.org

Argument mapping and analysis platform
https://arguman.org
Other
1.39k stars 152 forks source link

Add 'therefore' as a premise type ∴ #327

Open colinmegill opened 7 years ago

colinmegill commented 7 years ago

colinmegill commented 7 years ago

Yes, as conclusions. Excellent questions, certainly. I would imagine a group of 'because' ie., positive statements would be grouped together in support of a therefore, that's rather how legal language proceeds (ie., wherein)

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:26 PM Fatih Erikli notifications@github.com wrote:

Could you give us more context or examples?

Therefore premises should be the conclusion of the argument, right? I have a few questions in that case:

  • Would an argument contain more than one therefores?
  • How do we approve a therefore conclusion as a community in an argument?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org/issues/327#issuecomment-292034854, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABsDGUaS2Rg3rru9ES22wVJNBcm3MRGPks5rtDEtgaJpZM4M0rtN .

colinmegill commented 7 years ago

Wonderful. Yes, that's what was in my mind as well. It's rather nice to think of being able to visualize how people 'weight' things, ie., different people will come to different conclusions using different sets of positive individual premises, the sidebar would allow them to click through and compare outcomes.

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:00 PM Fatih Erikli notifications@github.com wrote:

So as I see, the therefore should be a premise-group in an argument, not an individual premise-type. It's more clear now in that case. Would be great to having such a feature.

We can plan the feature as user stories. Here is my first tryout.

Creating a conclusion scenario:

Story: User wants to create a new therefore or conclusion on an argument Clicks new conclusion button Picks one or more than one premises from current argument Types a title and clicks submit button

A scenario for listing conclusions:

Story: User wants to navigate on a conclusion Conclusions are listed on the sidebar Users clicks one of the listed conclusions Argument map highlights with a different stroke color the picked premises in conclusion

What do you think?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org/issues/327#issuecomment-292039516, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABsDGSQeVDhEh5hSCe5wmh_p62pMqAONks5rtDkugaJpZM4M0rtN .

colinmegill commented 5 years ago

This make it in?

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018, 11:06 PM Fatih Erikli notifications@github.com wrote:

Closed #327 https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org/issues/327.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/arguman/arguman.org/issues/327#event-1993715945, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABsDGaTBYs7jZEO7pTiRFH0V7g4Tc0dSks5uzwjUgaJpZM4M0rtN .