In #33 I had to have the triplet bellpepper, bellpepper-core and arecibo as dependencies, and I got a bit lost in how they are managed.
Looking at a some projects having those as dependency, it seems that most of them have adopted the "fork" approach that let's us quickly pull updates (lurk-rs, circom-scotia, arecibo, ...) while others (such as this one) have opted for a fixed crate version.
I think we would probably gain to try and unify the way we import those dependencies.
As @huitseeker suggested I tried various triplets of dependencies and it seems that the one that worked for me is bellpepper = 0.4.1bellpepper-core as fork and arecibo as fork. We could use this as a global approach.
tchataigner
commented
8 months ago
In #33 I had to have the triplet
bellpepper,bellpepper-coreandareciboas dependencies, and I got a bit lost in how they are managed.Looking at a some projects having those as dependency, it seems that most of them have adopted the "fork" approach that let's us quickly pull updates (lurk-rs, circom-scotia, arecibo, ...) while others (such as this one) have opted for a fixed crate version.
I think we would probably gain to try and unify the way we import those dependencies.
As @huitseeker suggested I tried various triplets of dependencies and it seems that the one that worked for me is
bellpepper = 0.4.1bellpepper-coreas fork andareciboas fork. We could use this as a global approach.