Closed winston-h-zhang closed 1 year ago
Hopefully, I've addressed most things and didn't butcher the section on commitments. I'm not sure what to call (comm ..)
and settled for "commitment primitive," but please correct me.
I think in one place you just wrote 'commitment' rather than 'commitment primitive', and I think that's actually appropriate. Just as objects of type Num
are numbers and Str
are strings, those of type Comm
are commitments.
Hey, sorry for the delay, I've pushed the changes!
@porcuquine the spec now reflects the new eval
and u64
changes.
The current spec is slightly out of date with what
lurk-rs
supports. This PR updates it as best as possible to match the current implementation.