Closed lgeretti closed 8 years ago
Original comment by Luca Geretti (Bitbucket: lgeretti, GitHub: lgeretti)
Plotted out all the values of z and zi between 0 and 2.5e-4. Got the interval of the final value of z for a full pass far from the critical point: z = [2.93782e-05, 2.94472e-05]. If we want to ablate 1.04mm, the number of passes should be [35.3 35.4]. For 36 passes, the depth is z = [1.0576152 mm, 1.0600992 mm] far from the critical point, while for the critical point we have 1.0794528 mm. For 35 passes, the worst-case actual depth far from the critical point is 1.028237mm, and 1.049468mm at the critical point. If on the other hand we want to ablate 1.04mm at the critical point, we need 34.8 passes. Using 34 passes, the worst-case actual depth far from the critical point becomes 0.9988588mm.
Original comment by Luca Geretti (Bitbucket: lgeretti, GitHub: lgeretti)
Analyzed using the 30 ms scan period, since it resulted in larger values with less noise. Obtained a maximum of z in the interval [1.5167e-4, 1.5168e-4] for x. This allows to analyze such interval (which has width 1e-8 and is treatable) to check for the maximum scan period. The minimum scan period has already been identified with 12 ms, if focusing on points far from the edge.
Originally reported by Luca Geretti (Bitbucket: lgeretti, GitHub: lgeretti)
Perform an analysis of the laser example to identify the points where zi is maximum. Focus on the 12 ms scan period, since it is the minimum for which ablation occurs.